Textio is a software platform designed to assist managers in writing clear and bias-free performance reviews. It leverages AI to reduce the time spent on writing while enhancing the quality of feedback. Textio offers real-time guidance, highlighting language that may be inappropriate and suggesting better alternatives.
With Textio, managers can skip the blank page and instantly generate a first draft that is refined by AI to be free of bias. The platform also provides actionable insights through its Textio Verified feature, ensuring that feedback is constructive and equitable. By improving the quality of workplace communication, Textio helps create a more inclusive and productive environment.
In addition to performance reviews, Textio supports managers in generating job posts and offers resources like Textio U for certifications in effective performance management and inclusive communication. This makes it a comprehensive tool for improving manager-employee interactions and fostering a healthier workplace culture.
Textio receives high praise for its intuitive interface, ability to eliminate biases in job descriptions, and useful automated suggestions. Many users appreciate its role in creating more appealing and well-written job posts. The tool also garners favor for its capacity to save time, improve workflow management, and enhance the quality and diversity of applicants.
The primary complaints revolve around the high cost, limited integration with other systems, and occasional rigidity in suggestions. A few users also noted issues with accessing previously used items and a lack of support for multiple languages. Some found customer service response times to be slow.
Many find the interface easy to use and navigate, making the process of writing job descriptions straightforward.
Textio is considered too expensive, especially for organizations with a low volume of job posts.
It's very easy to use, it's practically intuitive.
The cost of the product is too high for the amount of Job descriptions that we actually use it for.
Automatically provided word suggestions help in removing biases and improving the strength of job descriptions.
The lack of better integrations with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) was a noted drawback.
The automated suggestions are my favorite feature and help remove bias from JDs.
It would be great if there were better integrations with the ATS so hiring managers could write the JD directly in the job creation flow.
Textio aids in writing job descriptions that are more appealing and better targeted toward candidates.
Some experienced dissatisfaction with the rigidity of the suggestions, affecting the scoring if not adhered to.
Textio makes our job postings more interesting and allows us to reach our target audience better.
Sometimes the suggested options do not fit or work for what the text is needed and the score either drops or does not increase.
It effectively flags and reduces biased language, promoting fairness and inclusivity.
A few users found it cumbersome to access previously used items, indicating a need for improvements in the workflow.
It helps me write job descriptions that aren't biased which is important to me in my hiring process.
At times it can be cumbersome to access items previously used. The workflow could use a tweak or two.
The tool helps streamline the process of writing and managing job descriptions, saving valuable time.
Some users reported slow response times from customer service, diminishing the overall experience.
It has facilitated my work and saved time.
The customer service is subpar, takes quite a while to get an answer from them.
Textio receives high praise for its intuitive interface, ability to eliminate biases in job descriptions, and useful automated suggestions. Many users appreciate its role in creating more appealing and well-written job posts. The tool also garners favor for its capacity to save time, improve workflow management, and enhance the quality and diversity of applicants.
Many find the interface easy to use and navigate, making the process of writing job descriptions straightforward.
It's very easy to use, it's practically intuitive.
Automatically provided word suggestions help in removing biases and improving the strength of job descriptions.
The automated suggestions are my favorite feature and help remove bias from JDs.
Textio aids in writing job descriptions that are more appealing and better targeted toward candidates.
Textio makes our job postings more interesting and allows us to reach our target audience better.
It effectively flags and reduces biased language, promoting fairness and inclusivity.
It helps me write job descriptions that aren't biased which is important to me in my hiring process.
The tool helps streamline the process of writing and managing job descriptions, saving valuable time.
It has facilitated my work and saved time.
The primary complaints revolve around the high cost, limited integration with other systems, and occasional rigidity in suggestions. A few users also noted issues with accessing previously used items and a lack of support for multiple languages. Some found customer service response times to be slow.
Textio is considered too expensive, especially for organizations with a low volume of job posts.
The cost of the product is too high for the amount of Job descriptions that we actually use it for.
The lack of better integrations with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) was a noted drawback.
It would be great if there were better integrations with the ATS so hiring managers could write the JD directly in the job creation flow.
Some experienced dissatisfaction with the rigidity of the suggestions, affecting the scoring if not adhered to.
Sometimes the suggested options do not fit or work for what the text is needed and the score either drops or does not increase.
A few users found it cumbersome to access previously used items, indicating a need for improvements in the workflow.
At times it can be cumbersome to access items previously used. The workflow could use a tweak or two.
Some users reported slow response times from customer service, diminishing the overall experience.
The customer service is subpar, takes quite a while to get an answer from them.
Textio stands out for its intuitive design, making it easy to craft appealing and bias-free job descriptions. You might find its automated suggestions particularly useful, helping you target candidates better and streamline your workflow. The tool promises to save time and enhance the quality and diversity of applicants. However, you should be ready for the high cost if your organization posts job openings infrequently. Additionally, the tool’s integration with other systems and some rigidity in suggestions could pose challenges. Slow customer service response also came up. Overall, the sentiment leans positive with noted areas needing improvement.
The service offers a structured pricing plan for its various products. Below is an overview extracted from the information provided:
Basic | Pro | Enterprise | |
Prices | $29/month | $49/month | Contact Sales |
Monthly price if paid yearly | $24/month | $39/month | Contact Sales |
User limits | 1 user | 5 users | Unlimited users |
Features included | Basic AI assistance, Basic learning resources | Advanced AI assistance, Full learning resources, Textio Verified | All Pro features, Personalized training, Dedicated support |
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.
You must be logged in to submit a review.